PSYCHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE RESEARCH AND PSYCHOCORRECTIVENESS OF STUDENTS’ LIFE SUSTAINABILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35619/prap_rv.vi14.152Keywords:
students’ life sustainability, self-development, motivation for success, optimism, pessimism,, correction, stress overcoming, social and psychological trainingAbstract
The article reveals the theoretical substantiation and empirical consideration of psychological peculiarities of students’ life sustainability. The content of the problem in the scientific literature is analyzed. It is determined that sustainability is a system of persistent positive personalitytraits that can be considered as a certain personal resource, which contributes to successful adaptation to the new environment. The main function of life sustainability is to be able to build effective social interaction, to find optimal ways of self-development and self-realization of personality in terms of
difficult life circumstances. The results of an empirical study have determined that high levels of expressiveness of students’ sustainability prevent the emergence and overcoming internal stress in tensesituations and perceiving them as less significant. Students, diagnosed with high rates of resilience, are more open-minded, friendly, more confident. They are characterized by a high level of motivation for success and an optimistic attribute style that indicates the presence of willpower, self-control and responsibility for their actions. Optimism and sustainability make it easy to find something positive in negative events, to see life flexibly and realistically. Respondents with low levels of resilience, high levels of pessimism, and motivation to avoid failure are characterized by their inability to influence the situation. Such people “anticipate” a lack of success, make less effort and achieve fewer results. The obtained results were the psychological basis for the development of social and psychological training as an effective means of increasing the person’s life sustainability. The test scores and self-reports of the participants showed qualitative and quantitative changes in the development of life sustainability.