COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE PECULIARITIES OF PERSONAL WELL-BEING OF BORDER GUARDS AND SPECIALISTS OF OTHER PROFESSIONAL GROUPS ON DEPENDING ON WORK EXPERIENCE

Authors

  • Н. В. Волинець The National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine named after Bohdan Khmelnytsky.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35619/prap_rv.vi12.43

Keywords:

personal well-being, personal self-efficacy and harmony, professional competence and self-realization, , professional-organizational motivation, professional development and achievements

Abstract

In the article the results of the comparative analysis of the peculiarities of personal well-being of the staff of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine and psychologists, social workers and social pedagogues on depending on their work experience are represented. It has been revealed that the vast majority of border guards, psychologists, social workers and social educators have an average tendency to a high level of personal well-being, and that the level of personal well-being of border guards is higher compared to those of other professional groups. The highest values of personal well-being indicators were revealed among border guards with work experience of 21-30 years and psychologists, social workers and social pedagogues with work experience of 6-10 years and more than 30 years. The lowest values of personal well-being indicators were revealed in border guards, psychologists, social workers and social pedagogues with work experience of 0-5 years. It is shown that professional competence and self-realization, professional development and achievements, a general indicator of personal well-being of border guards, as well as professional competence and self-realization of psychologists, social workers and social pedagogues depend on their work experience.

Published

2019-11-03

How to Cite

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE PECULIARITIES OF PERSONAL WELL-BEING OF BORDER GUARDS AND SPECIALISTS OF OTHER PROFESSIONAL GROUPS ON DEPENDING ON WORK EXPERIENCE. (2019). Psychology: Reality and Perspectives, 12, 33-41. https://doi.org/10.35619/prap_rv.vi12.43